by Mary Stroka
Iowa schools must require masking when necessary as a reasonable accommodation for students with disabilities, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at St. Louis ruled Tuesday.
The court cited the Rehabilitation Act Section 504 in its determination.
What’s more, Iowa statute currently allows masking when federal law requires it, the court ruled, American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa said in an explainer of the ruling.
“Because this construction of law means the state law is not a facial violation of the federal disability laws, and because the court found the fault lies instead with the state’s enforcement of the law, the court held that an injunction against all schools is not necessary to protect the rights students with disabilities in those districts – not that they are exempt from the federal disability rights requirements,” the document said. “[Schools not involved in the lawsuit] still have to follow that federal law.”
The ACLU helped bring the case on behalf of The Arc of Iowa and 11 parents of children with disabilities, said in a news release. The court ruled the federal Rehabilitation Act’s Section 504 requires schools to impose universal masking rules where necessary to ensure students with disabilities have access to public school education.
Clients must have a preliminary injunction to ensure defendant school districts in Iowa provide universal masking as a reasonable accommodation so students with disabilities can attend school safely, the release said.
“Today’s decision is an important victory for the civil rights of children with disabilities in Iowa, who have a right to go to school with their peers,” ACLU of Iowa Legal Director Rita Bettis Austen said in the release. “No parent should have to choose between their child’s health and safety and their education, but that is the terrible position that the state put our clients in. It’s important to note that the court’s reasoning also means that even schools that are not named in the lawsuit should be requiring masks when needed to accommodate students with disabilities so they can go to school with their peers.”
U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pratt in September 2021 placed a temporary restraining order blocking House File 847, an Iowa state government attempt to ban mask mandates in schools. Iowa appealed that decision. The state will challenge the Tuesday decision too, Iowa Attorney General spokesman Lynn Hicks told The Center Square in an emailed statement Wednesday.
Hicks also said that the decision doesn’t take effect immediately.
“The district court’s injunction of the Iowa statute remains in place statewide – and the State will still not be enforcing the statute – until the case returns to the district court,” he said. “That will likely not happen for at least 21 days, which gives time for the State to seek rehearing of the appeal by the entire Eighth Circuit.”
– – –
Mary Stroka contributes to The Center Square.
ACLU will hurt the health of all the children to care for a small minority of the children. A better solution needs to be found. Kind of like the fox is in the hen house, kill all of the chickens to keep them away from the fox.
ACLU went full Communist many Years ago.